Search for: All records

Highly abundant proteins tend to evolve slowly (a trend called E-R anticorrelation), and a number of hypotheses have been proposed to explain this phenomenon. The misfolding avoidance hypothesis attributes the E-R anticorrelation to the abundance-dependent toxic effects of protein misfolding. To avoid these toxic effects, protein sequences (particularly those of highly expressed proteins) would be under selection to fold properly. One prediction of the misfolding avoidance hypothesis is that highly abundant proteins should exhibit high thermostability (i.e., a highly negative free energy of folding, ΔG). Thus far, only a handful of analyses have tested for a relationship between protein abundance and thermostability, producing contradictory results. These analyses have been limited by 1) the scarcity of ΔG data, 2) the fact that these data have been obtained by different laboratories and under different experimental conditions, 3) the problems associated with using proteins’ melting energy (Tm) as a proxy for ΔG, and 4) the difficulty of controlling for potentially confounding variables. Here, we use computational methods to compare the free energy of folding of pairs of human–mouse orthologous proteins with different expression levels. Even though the effect size is limited, the most highly expressed ortholog is often the one with a more negative ΔG of folding, indicating that highly expressed proteins are often more thermostable. 

Abstract BackgroundRecovering the historical patterns of selection acting on a protein coding sequence is a major goal of evolutionary biology. Mutation-selection models address this problem by explicitly modelling fixation rates as a function of site-specific amino acid fitness values.However, they are restricted in their utility for investigating directional evolution because they require prior knowledge of the locations of fitness changes in the lineages of a phylogeny. ResultsWe apply a modified mutation-selection methodology that relaxes assumptions of equlibrium and time-reversibility. Our implementation allows us to identify branches where adaptive or compensatory shifts in the fitness landscape have taken place, signalled by a change in amino acid fitness profiles. Through simulation and analysis of an empirical data set of$$\beta $$ $\beta$-lactamase genes, we test our ability to recover the position of adaptive events within the tree and successfully reconstruct initial codon frequencies and fitness profile parameters generated under the non-stationary model. ConclusionWe demonstrate successful detection of selective shifts and identification of the affected branch on partitions of 300 codons or more. We successfully reconstruct fitness parameters and initial codon frequencies in simulated data and demonstrate that failing to account for non-equilibrium evolution can increase the error in fitness profile estimation. We also demonstrate reconstruction of plausible shifts in amino acid fitnesses in the bacterial$$\beta $$ $\beta$-lactamase family and discuss some caveats for interpretation. 

Abstract There are known limitations in methods of detecting positive selection. Common methods do not enable differentiation between positive selection and compensatory covariation, a major limitation. Further, the traditional method of calculating the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) does not take into account the 3D structure of biomacromolecules nor differences between amino acids. It also does not account for saturation of synonymous mutations (dS) over long evolutionary time that renders codon-based methods ineffective for older divergences. This work aims to address these shortcomings for detecting positive selection through the development of a statistical model that examines clusters of substitutions in clusters of variable radii. Additionally, it uses a parametric bootstrapping approach to differentiate positive selection from compensatory processes. A previously reported case of positive selection in the leptin protein of primates was reexamined using this methodology. 

Gene duplication is an important process in the evolution of gene content in eukaryotic genomes. Understanding when gene duplicates contribute new molecular functions to genomes through molecular adaptation is one important goal in comparative genomics. In large gene families, however, characterizing adaptation and neofunctionalization across species is challenging, as models have traditionally quantified the timing of duplications without considering underlying gene trees. This protocol combines multiple approaches to detect adaptation in protein duplicates at a phylogenetic scale. We include a description of models for gene tree-species tree reconciliation that enable different types of inference, as well as a practical guide to their use. Although simulation-based approaches successfully detect shifts in the rate of duplica- tion/retention, the conflation between the duplication and retention processes, the distinct trajectories of duplicates under non-, sub-, and neofunctionalization, as well as dosage effects offer hitherto unexplored analytical avenues. We introduce mathematical descriptions of these probabilities and offer a road map to computational implementation whose starting point is parsimony reconciliation. Sequence evolution information based on the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous nucleotide substitution rates (dN/dS) can be combined with duplicate survival probabilities to better predict the emergence of new molecular functions in retained duplicates. Together, these methods enable characterization of potentially adaptive candidate duplicates whose neofunctionalization may contribute to phenotypic divergence across species.